The Performance Experience Index (PX Index)
The PX Index is scored from 0 to 100 and measures the real share of users benefiting from a good experience on a website. It is based on real-world user data from the Chrome UX Report, and on all the key metrics that shape the user journey : from server response time to on-screen interactions.
The overall score is calculated as a weighted average of the percentage of users having a good experience, with each metric weighted according to its real impact on perceived performance:
The full methodology is detailed in this article.
With this new methodology, the rankings offer a new lens.
We no longer focus solely on the 75th percentile values of each metric to determine whether a site “passes the thresholds”, but instead display the percentage of users having a good experience, in other words, those exceeding the threshold.
A percentage of 75% or more means that the metric meets Google’s “Good” threshold, as over 75% of users are experiencing a high-quality visit.
Each month, we analyze the mobile web performance of:
✅ The 50 most visited websites in France
🛒 The top 30 e-commerce platforms
📰 The top 20 media outlets
✈️ The 20 leading travel websites
Let’s dive into the February 2025 leaderboard.
Web Performance ranking: France’s 50 most visited sites
🏆 TOP 3: WHO’S LEADING THE PACK?
- 🥇 impots.gouv.fr retains first place with a PX Index of 94. The site continues to demonstrate remarkable control of the Core Web Vitals, with a very large majority of users benefiting from a fast, stable and smooth experience.
- 🥈 Leroy Merlin remains firmly in second place (PX Index 92). The platform confirms its maturity in web performance, delivering a consistent experience for the vast majority of its visitors.
- 🥉 Assurance Maladie once again completes the podium (PX Index 92). The site maintains excellent overall stability and continues to offer a reliable experience to its users.
The stability of this top trio shows that sustainable performance above all relies on the consistency of optimisation efforts over time.
📈 BIGGEST IMPROVEMENTS IN THE TOP 50
Several sites gained positions thanks to an increase in the share of users benefiting from a good experience, particularly in terms of visual stability.
- Free (6th, +14): the strongest progression this month, driven by a clear improvement in CLS, with +15% more users benefiting from good visual stability. The site therefore strengthens the overall fluidity of the experience.
- 20 Minutes (13th, +5): the site progresses thanks to a notable improvement in page stability, with +10% more users now in the green for CLS, improving reading comfort.
- L’Équipe (15th, +4): the site confirms the positive momentum observed in recent months and continues to climb the ranking thanks to a better distribution of users in the green across key metrics.
These gains prove that even seemingly minor improvements can have a major impact. They reflect sustained optimisation efforts — particularly around Interaction to Next Paint (INP). Remember: good FID doesn’t guarantee good INP. FID only measures the first interaction, whereas INP evaluates responsiveness across the entire session.
🔻 FALLING BACK
Conversely, some players moved down the ranking this month, often due to a drop in the proportion of users benefiting from an optimal experience.
- Ministère de l’Intérieur (11th, −5): the site recorded a notable decline in visual stability, with −13% of users in the green for CLS, directly impacting its ranking.
- Le Parisien (18th, −4): a slight deterioration in user experience leads to a drop in a very tight ranking.
- Le Figaro (21st, −4): the site loses several places in a context where several competitors are progressing more quickly.
- SFR (28th, −5): the drop is mainly linked to a deterioration in interactivity and stability, with +14% of users now experiencing a poor experience on INP and +9% of users moving into the orange zone on CLS.
These developments are a reminder that web performance remains a fragile balance, where user experience must be continuously monitored and optimised. Without ongoing attention, the risk of regression is high.
| Website | Ranking | Ranking M-1 | PX Index | LCP (% Good) | INP (% Good) | CLS (% Good) |
| impots.gouv.fr | 1 (0) | 1 | 94 | 95 | 92 | 98 |
| Leroy Merlin | 2 (0) | 2 | 92 | 94 | 88 | 93 |
| Assurance Maladie | 3 (0) | 3 | 92 | 94 | 94 | 96 |
| Cdiscount | 4 (1) | 5 | 91 | 98 | 81 | 94 |
| BFM TV | 5 (-1) | 4 | 91 | 92 | 87 | 88 |
See the full ranking
| Website | Ranking | Ranking M-1 | PX Index | LCP (% Good) | INP (% Good) | CLS (% Good) |
| impots.gouv.fr | 1 (0) | 1 | 94 | 95 | 92 | 98 |
| Leroy Merlin | 2 (0) | 2 | 92 | 94 | 88 | 93 |
| Assurance Maladie | 3 (0) | 3 | 92 | 94 | 94 | 96 |
| Cdiscount | 4 (1) | 5 | 91 | 98 | 81 | 94 |
| BFM TV | 5 (-1) | 4 | 91 | 92 | 87 | 88 |
| Free | 6 (14) | 20 | 90 | 88 | 92 | 90 |
| 7 (2) | 9 | 89 | 92 | 77 | 96 | |
| Franceinfo | 8 (-1) | 7 | 89 | 87 | 89 | 95 |
| La Redoute | 9 (-1) | 8 | 89 | 94 | 77 | 96 |
| Actu.fr | 10 (0) | 10 | 89 | 93 | 77 | 91 |
| Ministere de l’Intérieur | 11 (-5) | 6 | 88 | 89 | 92 | 85 |
| Bing | 12 (-1) | 11 | 88 | 90 | 80 | 91 |
| 20 Minutes | 13 (5) | 18 | 88 | 87 | 81 | 94 |
| Le Monde | 14 (-2) | 12 | 88 | 93 | 88 | 77 |
| L’Équipe | 15 (4) | 19 | 87 | 91 | 77 | 84 |
| AliExpress | 16 (-3) | 13 | 87 | 89 | 84 | 89 |
| Gala | 17 (-2) | 15 | 87 | 94 | 72 | 84 |
| Le Parisien | 18 (-4) | 14 | 87 | 87 | 77 | 92 |
| eBay | 19 (-3) | 16 | 86 | 86 | 79 | 96 |
| Ouest France | 20 (1) | 21 | 85 | 93 | 76 | 79 |
| Le Figaro | 21 (-4) | 17 | 85 | 95 | 66 | 79 |
| Service-Public.fr | 22 (3) | 25 | 85 | 82 | 83 | 95 |
| Amazon | 23 (-1) | 22 | 85 | 91 | 80 | 79 |
| Le Journal des Femmes | 24 (0) | 24 | 85 | 86 | 73 | 84 |
| Tele Loisirs | 25 (3) | 28 | 84 | 87 | 66 | 95 |
| But | 26 (1) | 27 | 84 | 90 | 74 | 79 |
| Voici | 27 (-1) | 26 | 83 | 87 | 60 | 93 |
| SFR | 28 (-5) | 23 | 83 | 88 | 71 | 85 |
| PagesJaunes | 29 (0) | 29 | 82 | 84 | 90 | 78 |
| Linternaute.com | 30 (2) | 32 | 82 | 85 | 67 | 80 |
| Marmiton | 31 (0) | 31 | 81 | 78 | 68 | 89 |
| Femme Actuelle | 32 (-2) | 30 | 80 | 83 | 58 | 92 |
| Boulanger | 33 (1) | 34 | 78 | 87 | 76 | 86 |
| E.Leclerc | 34 (1) | 35 | 77 | 79 | 79 | 60 |
| Credit Agricole | 35 (1) | 36 | 76 | 77 | 80 | 61 |
| Orange | 36 (-3) | 33 | 76 | 75 | 72 | 78 |
| Yahoo | 37 (1) | 38 | 75 | 82 | 62 | 95 |
| Vinted | 38 (2) | 40 | 73 | 74 | 65 | 90 |
| Carrefour | 39 (-2) | 37 | 73 | 79 | 69 | 46 |
| 40 (-1) | 39 | 71 | 56 | 63 | 97 | |
| Leboncoin.fr | 41 (0) | 41 | 70 | 80 | 45 | 64 |
| 42 (0) | 42 | 69 | 57 | 59 | 90 | |
| Rakuten France | 43 (1) | 44 | 69 | 76 | 61 | 79 |
| Darty | 44 (-1) | 43 | 68 | 73 | 83 | 48 |
| Dailymotion | 45 (1) | 46 | 66 | 64 | 58 | 71 |
| Fnac | 46 (-1) | 45 | 66 | 65 | 80 | 89 |
| LA POSTE | 47 (0) | 47 | 65 | 62 | 74 | 56 |
| Doctolib | 48 (0) | 48 | 65 | 47 | 79 | 80 |
| YouTube | 49 (0) | 49 | 45 | 34 | 26 | 64 |
| Wish | 50 (0) | 50 | 39 | 23 | 55 | 71 |
📊 Where Do France’s Top 50 Stand This Month?
These figures reflect a generally solid performance across the top 50, but with disparities depending on the metric. INP remains the hardest to stabilise over time.
INP doesn’t measure a single interaction, it reflects the overall responsiveness of the user journey. A page might feel fast on the first click… but frustrating on the second.
Looking more closely at the distribution of performance, we can observe the proportion of sites reaching Google’s green threshold, meaning those for which at least 75% of users benefit from a good experience on the metric concerned.
February’s results reveal a mixed dynamic.
- 50% of sites now pass all three Core Web Vitals, compared with 46% the previous month. This notable improvement shows that more and more players are managing to stabilise the user experience across the entire journey.
- However, only 12% display a PX Index considered good, compared with 18% last month. This decline highlights that even though more sites are meeting the technical thresholds, the actual distribution of user experience remains uneven.
At Fasterize, we see this every day: web performance is a business lever as much as an SEO and UX factor. Automating, monitoring and maintaining these optimisations is essential to remain competitive.
Distribution by metric
- 80% of sites reach the green threshold for LCP
- 56% reach the green threshold for INP (vs 60% last month)
- 82% of sites reach the green threshold for CLS
If we instead look at the average distribution of user experiences:
19% of users experience a poor LCP
16% encounter imperfect visual stability
26% still experience average interactivity
These figures confirm a key point: 👉 even when sites pass the thresholds, a significant share of users still experience a less fluid experience.
This is precisely what the Performance Experience Index highlights: performance is not simply about reaching a threshold, but about reducing the proportion of users exposed to a degraded experience.
Now, here is the e-commerce ranking, for which web performance is a business and SEO challenge.
Most visited e-commerce sites: their user experience
The February e-commerce ranking confirms a trend observed over the past several months: leaders continue to maintain very high levels of performance, while the middle of the ranking remains highly sensitive, where even small variations in the share of users benefiting from a good experience can quickly shift positions.
In a sector where every friction point can lead to basket abandonment, the stability of the user experience remains a key conversion factor.
🏆 TOP 3: E-COMMERCE LEADERS
🥇 Sézane (1st) retains the top spot with a PX Index of 94. The site continues to stand out thanks to a particularly consistent experience, with over 90% of users in the green across all three metrics.
🥈 Ikea (2nd) remains firmly in second place (PX Index 93). The platform delivers a robust and balanced experience, with a very large majority of users benefiting from fast loading and smooth navigation.
🥉 Leroy Merlin (3rd) completes the podium with a PX Index of 92. The site maintains a stable experience despite the functional richness of its catalogue and the complexity of its journeys.
The top three are separated by less than two points on the PX Index: clear evidence that even micro-optimisations can tip the balance. These are examples to follow for staying competitive, boosting conversions, and delivering a flawless user experience.
📈 WHO’S MOVING UP?
Several players gained positions thanks to an improvement in the share of users benefiting from a good experience.
- Gifi (9th, +4): the site climbs the ranking thanks to improved visual stability, with 90% of users now in the green for CLS, strengthening the overall smoothness of the journey.
- Rakuten (25th, +2): gains a few positions thanks to improved visual stability for part of its audience, reducing disruptions during navigation.
- Castorama (27th, +2): progresses thanks to combined improvements in LCP and INP, allowing more users to benefit from fast loading and smoother interactions.
🔻 WHO’S FALLING BEHIND?
Conversely, some players dropped in the ranking, often due to a deterioration in the share of users benefiting from a good experience.
- Groupon (29th, −5): the most significant drop this month. The site recorded a decline across all metrics, particularly loading performance: 12% more users now experience poor LCP, with pages taking longer to display.
- Auchan (12th, −3): the site drops due to a deterioration in initial loading, with a larger share of users experiencing slower LCP.
In e-commerce, the impacts are immediate: every millisecond lost can lead to abandoned baskets.
| Website | Ranking | Ranking M-1 | PX Index | LCP (% Good) | INP (% Good) | CLS (% Good) |
| Sézane | 1 (0) | 1 | 94 | 96 | 91 | 93 |
| Ikea | 2 (0) | 2 | 93 | 95 | 90 | 93 |
| Leroy Merlin | 3 (0) | 3 | 92 | 94 | 88 | 93 |
| Cdiscount | 4 (0) | 4 | 91 | 98 | 81 | 94 |
| Zalando | 5 (0) | 5 | 89 | 91 | 82 | 92 |
See the full ranking
| Website | Ranking | Ranking M-1 | PX Index | LCP (% Good) | INP (% Good) | CLS (% Good) |
| Sézane | 1 (0) | 1 | 94 | 96 | 91 | 93 |
| Ikea | 2 (0) | 2 | 93 | 95 | 90 | 93 |
| Leroy Merlin | 3 (0) | 3 | 92 | 94 | 88 | 93 |
| Cdiscount | 4 (0) | 4 | 91 | 98 | 81 | 94 |
| Zalando | 5 (0) | 5 | 89 | 91 | 82 | 92 |
| Laredoute | 6 (0) | 6 | 89 | 94 | 77 | 96 |
| Showroomprive | 7 (0) | 7 | 88 | 87 | 87 | 90 |
| Conforama | 8 (0) | 8 | 87 | 92 | 83 | 93 |
| Gifi | 9 (4) | 13 | 87 | 90 | 89 | 90 |
| AliExpress | 10 (0) | 10 | 87 | 89 | 84 | 89 |
| Ebay | 11 (0) | 11 | 86 | 86 | 79 | 96 |
| Auchan | 12 (-3) | 9 | 86 | 86 | 81 | 92 |
| Amazon | 13 (-1) | 12 | 85 | 91 | 80 | 79 |
| Sephora | 14 (1) | 15 | 84 | 93 | 62 | 86 |
| BUT | 15 (-1) | 14 | 84 | 90 | 74 | 79 |
| Decathlon | 16 (1) | 17 | 82 | 86 | 59 | 92 |
| Manomano | 17 (-1) | 16 | 81 | 81 | 78 | 84 |
| Veepee | 18 (1) | 19 | 80 | 86 | 81 | 67 |
| Boulanger | 19 (-1) | 18 | 78 | 87 | 76 | 86 |
| Leclerc | 20 (0) | 20 | 77 | 79 | 79 | 60 |
| Etsy | 21 (0) | 21 | 76 | 82 | 88 | 96 |
| Carrefour | 22 (0) | 22 | 73 | 79 | 69 | 46 |
| Leboncoin | 23 (0) | 23 | 70 | 80 | 45 | 64 |
| Cultura | 24 (1) | 25 | 70 | 70 | 81 | 72 |
| Rakuten | 25 (2) | 27 | 69 | 76 | 61 | 79 |
| Darty | 26 (0) | 26 | 68 | 73 | 83 | 48 |
| Castorama | 27 (2) | 29 | 67 | 78 | 70 | 84 |
| Fnac | 28 (0) | 28 | 66 | 65 | 80 | 89 |
| Groupon | 29 (-5) | 24 | 64 | 62 | 74 | 83 |
| Shein | 30 (0) | 30 | 59 | 62 | 59 | 79 |
| Nocibe | 31 (0) | 31 | 53 | 67 | 37 | 55 |
| Wish | 32 (0) | 32 | 39 | 23 | 55 | 71 |
On average, 13% of e-commerce sites achieve a PX Index considered excellent, while 32% meet all three Core Web Vitals.
78% of sites reach the green threshold for LCP, indicating that initial loading is generally well under control.
66% reach the green threshold for INP, confirming that interactivity remains a more difficult metric to stabilise.
48% reach the green threshold for CLS, showing that visual stability still remains an area for improvement for part of the sector.
From the users’ perspective, the experience remains mixed:
18% still experience slow loading (LCP)
25% face degraded interactivity (INP)
19% encounter visual stability issues (CLS)
These results are partly explained by the post-sales period, during which sites are emerging from a peak in traffic and numerous updates (catalogues, promotions, marketing campaigns).
Maintaining a stable level of performance after these periods of intense activity remains a challenge, but also represents a key lever for preserving conversion rates and user satisfaction.
Media sites: ranking of the most visited mobile platforms
In the media sector, web performance remains a key engagement factor. Page loading speed, visual stability, and responsiveness directly determine reading comfort and user retention.
🏆 TOP 3: MEDIA LEADERS
🥇 BFMTV (1st, stable) retains the top spot with a PX Index of 91. The site delivers a solid and consistent experience, with more than 85% of users in the green across all metrics.
🥈 Franceinfo (2nd, stable) confirms its position thanks to excellent visual stability, with 95% of users benefiting from a green CLS, ensuring optimal reading comfort despite frequent content updates.
🥉 Actu (3rd, stable) completes the podium with a very robust experience, driven by a particularly strong LCP, with over 93% of users in the green.
The gaps remain tight at the top of the ranking, where even the smallest optimisation can make a difference. The top trio therefore remains unchanged, demonstrating strong web performance maturity among these players.
📈 CLIMBING THE RANKS THIS MONTH:
20 Minutes (4th, +4): one of the most notable climbs this month, driven by improved visual stability. 94% of users now benefit from a green CLS, an increase of +9% compared with last month, significantly improving reading comfort.
L’Équipe (6th, +3): the site progresses thanks to slight improvements across all metrics, increasing the share of users benefiting from a good overall experience.
These improvements show that gradual optimisation of performance distribution can be enough to gain several places in a very tight ranking.
🔻 DECLINES:
Le Parisien (8th, −3): the site drops slightly in the ranking in a highly competitive context where several players are progressing faster.
Le Figaro (10th, −3): the decline is partly explained by worsening visual stability, with a larger share of users experiencing layout shifts during loading.
These variations illustrate a reality of the sector: performance must be continuously maintained, as a few percentage points in distribution can be enough to shift the ranking.
| Website | Ranking | Ranking M-1 | PX Index | LCP (% Good) | INP (% Good) | CLS (% Good) |
| BFMTV | 1 (0) | 1 | 91 | 92 | 87 | 88 |
| Franceinfo | 2 (0) | 2 | 89 | 87 | 89 | 95 |
| Actu | 3 (0) | 3 | 89 | 93 | 77 | 91 |
| 20minutes | 4 (4) | 8 | 88 | 87 | 81 | 94 |
| Le monde | 5 (-1) | 4 | 88 | 93 | 88 | 77 |
See the full ranking
| Website | Ranking | Ranking M-1 | PX Index | LCP (% Good) | INP (% Good) | CLS (% Good) |
| BFMTV | 1 (0) | 1 | 91 | 92 | 87 | 88 |
| Franceinfo | 2 (0) | 2 | 89 | 87 | 89 | 95 |
| Actu | 3 (0) | 3 | 89 | 93 | 77 | 91 |
| 20minutes | 4 (4) | 8 | 88 | 87 | 81 | 94 |
| Le monde | 5 (-1) | 4 | 88 | 93 | 88 | 77 |
| L’équipe | 6 (3) | 9 | 87 | 91 | 77 | 84 |
| Gala | 7 (-1) | 6 | 87 | 94 | 72 | 84 |
| Le Parisien | 8 (-3) | 5 | 87 | 87 | 77 | 92 |
| Ouest-France | 9 (1) | 10 | 85 | 93 | 76 | 79 |
| Le Figaro | 10 (-3) | 7 | 85 | 95 | 66 | 79 |
| Le journal des femmes | 11 (0) | 11 | 85 | 86 | 73 | 84 |
| programme-tv.net | 12 (0) | 12 | 84 | 87 | 66 | 95 |
| Voici | 13 (0) | 13 | 83 | 87 | 60 | 93 |
| L’internaute | 14 (2) | 16 | 82 | 85 | 67 | 80 |
| marmiton.org | 15 (0) | 15 | 81 | 78 | 68 | 89 |
| Femme Actuelle | 16 (-2) | 14 | 80 | 83 | 58 | 92 |
| Yahoo | 17 (0) | 17 | 75 | 82 | 62 | 95 |
| Dailymotion | 18 (0) | 18 | 66 | 64 | 58 | 71 |
| Youtube | 19 (0) | 19 | 45 | 34 | 26 | 64 |
On average:
84% of users benefit from a good LCP, showing that loading of the main content is generally well controlled
69% benefit from good interactivity (INP), a metric that remains more difficult to stabilise
86% enjoy good visual stability (CLS), ensuring satisfactory reading comfort
Overall, the media sector remains mature in terms of web performance, although some metrics remain harder to optimise consistently over time.
5% of sites achieve a PX Index above 90
42% of sites meet all three Core Web Vitals
In detail:
89% of sites reach the green threshold for LCP, showing that initial loading is now widely under control
42% reach the green threshold for INP, confirming that interactivity remains the sector’s main challenge
89% reach the green threshold for CLS, indicating generally satisfactory visual stability
Maintaining these levels, rather than chasing occasional peaks, will be key to ensuring a smooth reading experience.
Travel: Performance of the most visited travel websites
Comparison engines, booking platforms and transport operators must deal with complex user journeys, high functional density, large volumes of data, and highly variable traffic peaks depending on the season. In this context, ensuring a smooth and stable experience for the majority of users remains a challenge.
This ranking highlights a sector where performance is progressing slowly, but where the gaps remain significant compared with other verticals.
🏆 TOP 3: TRAVEL LEADERS
- 🥇 easyvoyage (1st, stable) retains the top spot with a PX Index of 90 and remains the only player in the sector to reach a level considered excellent. The site delivers a particularly balanced experience, with more than 85% of users in the green across all metrics.
- 🥈 ViaMichelin (2nd, stable) confirms its robustness with a PX Index of 82, driven by excellent visual stability. Interactivity remains more fragile, however, which limits its progression.
- 🥉 SNCF Connect (3rd, stable) completes the podium with a PX Index also at 82. The site offers a generally solid experience, with interactivity well controlled for a large proportion of users.
📈 ON THE RISE:
- fr.hotels (8th, +2)
The site continues its progression with improvements across all metrics. Interactivity is improving in particular: 70% of users now benefit from a green INP, an encouraging development that brings the metric closer to the recommended threshold.
🔻 DECLINES:
- Airbnb (15th, −2)
The site slips slightly in the ranking due to a small deterioration in the distribution of metrics, with a larger share of users experiencing an average experience.
| Website | Ranking | Ranking M-1 | PX Index | LCP (% Good) | INP (% Good) | CLS (% Good) |
| easyvoyage | 1 (0) | 1 | 90 | 94 | 85 | 95 |
| viamichelin | 2 (0) | 2 | 82 | 91 | 48 | 95 |
| sncf-connect | 3 (0) | 3 | 82 | 81 | 82 | 83 |
| tripadvisor | 4 (0) | 4 | 80 | 83 | 76 | 76 |
| mappy | 5 (0) | 5 | 75 | 76 | 57 | 86 |
Voir le classement complet
| Website | Ranking | Ranking M-1 | PX Index | LCP (% Good) | INP (% Good) | CLS (% Good) |
| easyvoyage | 1 (0) | 1 | 90 | 94 | 85 | 95 |
| viamichelin | 2 (0) | 2 | 82 | 91 | 48 | 95 |
| sncf-connect | 3 (0) | 3 | 82 | 81 | 82 | 83 |
| tripadvisor | 4 (0) | 4 | 80 | 83 | 76 | 76 |
| mappy | 5 (0) | 5 | 75 | 76 | 57 | 86 |
| abritel | 6 (0) | 6 | 75 | 79 | 69 | 83 |
| trivago | 7 (0) | 7 | 73 | 80 | 35 | 82 |
| fr.hotels | 8 (2) | 10 | 72 | 67 | 70 | 78 |
| viagogo | 9 (-1) | 8 | 72 | 74 | 76 | 76 |
| liligo | 10 (-1) | 9 | 70 | 61 | 56 | 69 |
| thetrainline | 11 (0) | 11 | 68 | 81 | 36 | 64 |
| ouigo | 12 (0) | 12 | 67 | 78 | 42 | 48 |
| kayak | 13 (1) | 14 | 64 | 68 | 55 | 49 |
| skyscanner | 14 (1) | 15 | 63 | 60 | 40 | 73 |
| airbnb | 15 (-2) | 13 | 63 | 60 | 45 | 60 |
| all accor | 16 (0) | 16 | 63 | 60 | 50 | 84 |
| booking | 17 (0) | 17 | 60 | 63 | 57 | 93 |
| opodo | 18 (0) | 18 | 56 | 48 | 42 | 58 |
| airfrance | 19 (0) | 19 | 50 | 52 | 25 | 56 |
📊 Where does the travel ranking stand this month?
On average:
29% of users experience slow loading (LCP)
45% face degraded interactivity (INP)
26% encounter imperfect visual stability (CLS
❌ The travel sector remains the most behind among the major verticals analysed.
Only one site exceeds a PX Index of 90, and the sector’s average PX Index is capped at 70, compared with 79 for e-commerce and 82 for media.
16% of sites meet all three Core Web Vitals
47% reach the green threshold for LCP
21% (vs 16% last month) reach the green threshold for INP
58% (vs 52%) reach the green threshold for CLS
The signals are nevertheless slightly positive: some platforms are implementing targeted optimisations, particularly on initial loading and visual stability. INP still remains the main barrier to faster improvements in user experience across the sector.
Web performance is no longer just about an isolated technical metric: it’s about the site’s ability to continuously offer a good experience to the majority of users.
This month’s variations, between sectors and between individual sites, show that a few targeted optimisations can drive quick progress, but sites can just as quickly fall back if they ease up on their efforts. Meeting Google’s green threshold is a step; maintaining it is the real challenge.
In this context, web performance becomes a strategic lever in its own right, at the crossroads of UX, SEO, and business. Improving the proportion of users in the green means reducing friction, securing journeys, and creating long-lasting competitive advantage.
Where does your site rank?
Analyse your site’s performance in 1 click and compare yourself to the leaders in your sector:
- ✅ Assess the percentage of users enjoying a good experience
- ✅ Get your PX Index
- ✅ Compare yourself to your competitors and sector
And what better way to kick off this effort than with the support of web performance experts?
Fasterize is here to guide you with concrete solutions to make your site faster, more stable, and more responsive.
⭐ See you next month for another deep dive into the web experience of France’s top sites!
